Reading John Lanchester's book 'Whoops' about the international financial crisis whilst on holiday (its a laugh out loud read, not many books about financial capitalism you can say that about). He writes about how banksters invented derivatives to outwit the financial regulators and create the impression of low risk for loans based on junk mortgages which they sold to all and sundry.
A brilliant metaphor he makes, comparing the regulators to lifeguards who weren't asleep but trying to cope with swimmers who were pouring blood into the water because they thought a few sharks would make it more exciting!
All the Collatoralised Debt Obligations and Credit Default Swaps and even CDOs 'squared' (read the book for an explanation and to realise how we were all conned by these legalised crooks) created such a fog and confusion, the whole banking system blocked up. Money ceased to be reliable.
It made me think, In the 19th century the same process happened with industrial capitalism. Mills and factories created such pollution that they could not operate. Water was too dirty to be used to wash wool in Bradford for example. The already rich industrialists had to bang factory owners' heads together to impose the first environmental protection laws to control pollution.
The same happened with public health because they were running out of labour due to the high death and disability rates caused to the working class. Free laissez faire enterprise had to be controlled to prevent a clogging up of free enterprise.
They used physical resources. 21st century financial capitalism uses information as a resource. CDOs and CDSs pollute the pool of information. But whereas all industrial capitalists wanted a low pollution environment, financial capitalists actively try to pollute the information environment. It's the way they create the tiny differences between buying and selling prices they exploit to make their profits in huge computerised purchases and sales many times a second.
So the financial regulators have a much tougher job than the 19th century equivalents.
What's this to do with coops? Lanchester speculates about business that exists to serve need rather than just to make money by any means. He suggests those days are over. He also says financial capitalism is a near dead duck. It is irrecoverably polluted. But he doesn't mention coops once. Coops exist and survive only so long as they serve their member's needs. And can survive when capitalism is so polluted by financial dodgy dealings it is having another in its series of heart attacks.
People laugh at Marx's belief that capitalism is its own grave digger. He didnt just think this would happen when labour organised, as people commonly believe. He also predicted the suicidal dynamics of financier capitalism. He may still be proved right.
But capitalism is a master at cliff edge thrillers so what will they do next to protect their right to our wealth? Are the shocks coming so hard and fast that the financial doctors cannot keep the raddled body alive?
A few years ago (before the financial crash) I was at a reception in the House of Lords and heard the Tory MP for the City of London, Mark Field, say the party was over. The 150 year reign of the joint stock company (the corporate legal person) was coming to an end. It was no longer fit for purpose in an age of international computerised finance. (No one was listening in his own party.) His solution? Mutuals and Cooperatives which exist to serve and provide needs directly and not as a by product of uncontrollable corporations.
How do we communicate the case for a co-operative economy? - We all tend to tell the stories that reaffirm our existing beliefs. Where we flock together with others that share our assumptions, we tend to communicate ...
3 days ago